State Department Therapy Sessions Following Trump Win Paid For By Taxpayers

Antony Blinken’s State Department has come under scrutiny after reports revealed that federal funds were used to host therapy sessions for employees upset by President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. The sessions, described by one source as “cry sessions,” were intended to help staff process Vice President Kamala Harris’ loss in the election.

Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) blasted the move, accusing the Department of pandering to employees’ political disappointments at taxpayer expense. Issa raised concerns in a formal letter to Blinken, questioning the appropriateness of using federal resources for such purposes.

“It is unacceptable that taxpayer dollars are being spent to accommodate employees who cannot handle the results of a free and fair election,” Issa stated. He also highlighted the broader implications of the Department’s actions, suggesting they reflect poorly on its ability to carry out the incoming administration’s policies.

An internal email circulated by the State Department invited employees to a webinar offering stress management techniques. Issa criticized this as an example of the agency prioritizing partisan sensitivities over its mission. He expressed doubts about whether State Department staff would cooperate in implementing Trump’s foreign policy goals.

Issa demanded details about the sessions, including their costs and whether more are planned. He also suggested that employees unwilling to support the lawful policies of the incoming administration should resign rather than obstruct the democratic process.

The controversy has sparked debate about the role of federal agencies during transitions of power. Critics argue that hosting therapy sessions for political reasons undermines the nonpartisan mission of government institutions and misuses taxpayer funds.

The episode has drawn the ire of conservatives, who see it as emblematic of partisanship within federal agencies. Many have called for greater accountability to ensure that government resources are used appropriately.