South Carolina vs. Woke Medicine – BLOCKS Planned Parenthood!

South Carolina stands up to woke medicine and demands the right to stop funding Planned Parenthood with YOUR tax dollars, while the Supreme Court decides if states or federal bureaucrats control healthcare spending.

At a Glance

  • Supreme Court is hearing South Carolina’s case to remove Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program, a decision that could impact how states control healthcare funding nationwide
  • Governor Henry McMaster issued orders in 2018 to terminate Planned Parenthood’s Medicaid participation, citing taxpayer opposition to funding abortion providers
  • Democrat-appointed justices argue Medicaid recipients should have equal provider choice as privately insured patients, while South Carolina contends states should control their own funding decisions
  • The case has garnered support from 18 states, the federal government, members of Congress, and pro-life groups
  • Decision expected by the end of June could reshape states’ ability to defund abortion providers despite federal Medicaid rules

The Battle for States’ Rights Over Federal Mandates

Americans are sick and tired of seeing their hard-earned tax dollars funneled to organizations they morally oppose, and South Carolina is finally doing something about it. In a case that could reshape how states manage their Medicaid programs, South Carolina is standing firm against federal bureaucratic overreach that forces states to fund Planned Parenthood.

The Supreme Court now holds the power to decide whether states can exclude abortion providers from receiving Medicaid dollars, despite technical arguments about who gets final say over healthcare provider qualification. It’s a classic battle between state sovereignty and federal control, with the left predictably advocating for centralized authority over local values.

South Carolina’s lawyer, John Bursch, cut straight to the heart of the matter in his arguments before the high court. He didn’t mince words about whose interests are really at stake. “South Carolina ‘should be free’ to honor the majority of Americans’ opposition to taxpayer-funded abortions and be selective with which providers get Americans’ hard-earned dollars,” Bursch stated, articulating what any reasonable taxpayer already knows. While the left hides behind convoluted legal arguments about provider choice, this case is fundamentally about whether unelected judges can force states to fund abortion-adjacent services against the will of their citizens.

The Liberal Medicaid Protection Racket

Let’s be clear about what’s really happening here. Planned Parenthood knows exactly what it’s doing by insisting on Medicaid funding. Nearly half of their patients nationwide receive care through Medicaid, making it a crucial funding source for their operations.

The abortion giant uses non-abortion services as a shield to maintain public funding while conducting their lucrative abortion business under the same roof. They’ve mastered the art of the shell game – taking government money for “healthcare” while operating abortion facilities right next door. And when states try to stop this obvious end-run around taxpayer protections, they cry discrimination.

“Taxpayer dollars should never be used to fund facilities that profit off abortion and distribute dangerous gender-transition drugs to minors,” said John Bursch, representing South Carolina before the Supreme Court.

The left’s disingenuous argument that this case is simply about healthcare access for low-income patients falls apart under the slightest scrutiny. As Bursch pointed out during oral arguments, “You’ve got roughly 200 publicly funded health care clinics in South Carolina that provide a broad range of high-quality health care services, including family-planning services.”

The idea that Planned Parenthood is the only option for poor patients is a manufactured crisis designed to force taxpayers to fund an organization many find morally reprehensible. The abortion industry’s desperate dependence on government funding speaks volumes about the actual popularity of their services in the free market.

The Constitutional Question at Stake

Beyond the moral and financial arguments lies a critical constitutional question that affects every American: Who decides how your tax dollars are spent? Should it be your elected state representatives who are accountable to voters, or unelected federal judges and distant bureaucrats?

The Medicaid statute was never intended to create a system where individuals could drag states into federal court over provider decisions. Yet that’s exactly what’s happening as the left attempts to remove all decision-making authority from states when it comes to administering these programs.

“Congress didn’t intend to allow Medicaid recipients to drag states into federal court to challenge those decisions—nor did Congress intend for federal courts to second-guess states’ decisions about which providers are qualified to receive Medicaid funding.”, says South Carolina’s legal representation John Bursch.

The stakes couldn’t be higher. If South Carolina prevails, states across America will finally have the freedom to ensure taxpayer dollars align with their citizens’ values. If Planned Parenthood wins, the federal government will further erode state sovereignty, forcing even the most pro-life states to fund organizations deeply involved in abortion.

For all the left’s talk about “democracy,” they seem remarkably comfortable having unelected judges overrule the democratic decisions of state legislatures and governors when it suits their agenda. The founders never intended for federal courts to dictate detailed spending decisions to sovereign states, but that’s exactly what the progressive legal establishment demands.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR