
South Carolina’s veteran shrimper Craig Reaves believes Trump’s tariffs could save America’s dying shrimp industry from the flood of foreign imports that has devastated local fishermen for decades.
At a Glance
- The U.S. imports a staggering 94% of its shrimp consumption, primarily from India (42%) and Ecuador (27%)
- Craig Reaves, a multi-generational shrimper, supports Trump’s tariffs as providing “immediate relief” to U.S. fisheries
- Foreign shrimp farming allegedly involves environmental destruction, illegal hormone use, and forced labor practices
- American shrimpers lack infrastructure after decades of decline but see tariffs as an opportunity to rebuild domestic production
A Struggling American Industry Faces Foreign Competition
The American shrimp industry has been fighting a losing battle against foreign imports for decades. Craig Reaves, a lifelong South Carolina shrimper whose family business spans generations, has witnessed firsthand the devastating impact of cheap foreign shrimp flooding U.S. markets. The statistics paint a stark picture: a remarkable 94% of shrimp consumed in the United States comes from overseas, with India supplying 42% and Ecuador providing 27% of imports. This overwhelming market dominance has pushed many American shrimpers to the brink of extinction.
As overseas producers offer shrimp at prices American fishermen cannot match, domestic shrimping operations have steadily closed. Processing facilities have disappeared, boats have been decommissioned, and essential industry infrastructure has collapsed across traditional shrimping communities. The decline represents not just economic hardship for coastal communities but the potential loss of a traditional American industry that once thrived along U.S. coastlines from the Carolinas to the Gulf states.
Environmental and Ethical Concerns with Imported Shrimp
Reaves argues that the lower price of imported shrimp comes with significant hidden costs. Foreign shrimp farming, particularly in Southeast Asia, has been documented to cause severe environmental damage. Traditional mangrove ecosystems are frequently destroyed to create shrimp ponds, eliminating critical coastal habitats and natural storm buffers. The industrial shrimp farming methods employed abroad often involve practices that would be illegal under American regulations, including the use of antibiotics and chemicals prohibited in U.S. food production.
“They are pond raised, farm raised product — they do not care about the environment in Southeast Asia, they are destroying ecosystems … they’re using illegal hormones, forced labor, slave labor — all these things are documented.”, says Craig Reaves.
Human rights concerns compound the environmental issues. Reports of forced labor and exploitative working conditions in some foreign shrimp operations raise ethical questions about American consumption patterns. Reaves and other domestic shrimpers contend that consumers are largely unaware of these problems when purchasing imported shrimp at their local supermarkets, where origin labeling can be inconsistent or difficult to spot. The result is American consumers unknowingly supporting practices that undermine both environmental standards and human rights.
Tariffs as a Pathway to Industry Revival
President Trump’s proposed tariffs have given American shrimpers like Reaves new hope for rebuilding their industry. While critics argue tariffs may increase consumer prices in the short term, Reaves sees them as essential protection that could finally level the playing field. The immediate price differential between domestic and imported shrimp may narrow, potentially driving consumers toward American-caught products and creating opportunity for growth in domestic production.
“I am a lifelong shrimper, my dad was a shrimper, so we are generational fishermen, and we have been getting killed by imports, for not just years, but literally decades. We’ve been suffering for a long, long time, and these tariffs, we believe, are going to give us some immediate relief.”, concludes Craig Reaves.
Reaves acknowledges that the American shrimp industry currently lacks the capacity to meet national demand after decades of decline. However, he sees tariffs as the catalyst needed to rebuild processing facilities, expand fishing fleets, and restore the industry’s infrastructure. According to Reaves, the increased attention to the industry’s plight is itself valuable, potentially educating consumers about the quality difference between wild-caught American shrimp and mass-produced foreign alternatives. For coastal communities once dependent on shrimping, the potential revival represents not just economic opportunity but the preservation of cultural heritage.